Given Anvil’s boast that the Arrow is the “most agile fighter in its class”, and that it is smaller and cheaper than the Gladius, with identical maximum hardpoints and components, why would I want a Gladius instead?Īnvil Aerospace built the Arrow to compete with the Gladius for a lucrative military contract. Therefore, the Hawk will also be faster than the Arrow (to chase down its bounties), but not as maneuverable. The Hawk is slightly harder to compare, as it is intended to have above-average maneuverability and speed but not in an extreme capacity. The Arrow is more maneuverable than the Gladius, but isn’t as fast. How does the Arrow compare to Aegis’ Gladius and Anvil’s own Hawk in the light fighter role? We’re working towards making the Arrow true to its intent. The Arrow seems particularly prone to this bug, but cycling the landing gear often fixes it. The current handling is a result of a bug in the current IFCS system that affects all ships randomly. It is intended to have agile handling as described. However, once you try it in game, it handles like a turtle. The commercial states that this ship is one of the fastest and most agile in its class. Utilizing stealth components could allow the Arrow to be used as a patrol craft without being seen, or in an ambush to surprise one’s enemies. However the Stealth part is still valid, in reference to the class of components with which the Arrow can be fitted. This is an error on the webstore due to a mix up on the internal design page and it should say Light Fighter and has been corrected. What gives it the designation “Stealth” on the ship page?
0 Comments
Leave a Reply. |
AuthorWrite something about yourself. No need to be fancy, just an overview. ArchivesCategories |